Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[marjac]

Yes, mrmain. It is an issue that needs to be addressed. The Rule 60 motion will be accompanied by an equally important Rule 24 Motion to Intervene.

We need to show an interest in the property/transaction that is the subject of the action, that interest has been impaired, and that interest is not being adequately represented by the parties to the action. The Rule is broadly construed in favor of Intervenors.

The interests range from that as shareholders, to the public interest in the promotion of cardiovascular health, to the public interest of promoting the truth and integrity of the court process.

Those interests have been dramatically impaired by the 3/30 decision.

Those interests are not being adequately represented by Amarin or its lawyers, as evidenced by the failure of Amarin to file the Rule 60 Motion despite receiving a formal demand to do so.

This is a Cliffnotes version. I am not taking this lightly, but neither am I lying awake at night with ulcers concerned that there is not merit to the Rule 24 motion. If the facts and law are followed, the motion should be granted.