InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 10251
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/03/2008

Re: rawman post# 94138

Tuesday, 01/05/2021 5:03:36 PM

Tuesday, January 05, 2021 5:03:36 PM

Post# of 97078
I get it, but to me what he did on the message boards pales in comparison to the PRs implying that the tests would/did work. Beside him just being his ahole self, ridiculously challenging any critical post, for "proof positive", his postings were mild compared to what the other arrested CEO did. (I'm not defending Berman. Read the docs on the other case, and you'll see what I mean).

I didn't just reread all Berman's posts right now, but what were his worst posts? Yes, intimidation, threats, but he really didn't post information that wasn't in PRs already, with only a few exceptions.

One of his posts I did forward to the SEC was when he challenged me saying "well if they posted their test results, would that change your mind"? (paraphrasing). I didn't bite, knowing the test results would be partial and meaningless. Until that point, the idea of posting test results was never discussed before by DECNers. Just a few days later, voila, DECN PRed that test results would be available to those that give Berman information, through a password. I said to the SEC, either this is Berman posting to me, or it is someone getting inside information from Berman, in advance, and likely trading on it. (yes, Keith, you can thank me for that!)

So, besides threats, what 2 or 3 posts would you reference as the most blatant Berman post/pumps, that weren't repeats of information in prior PRs?