Global Digital Solutions Inc (GDSI)

[Coreton]

Easy summation of what I just read by Rontans Counsel (DE 269)

First a default judgement for plaintiff establishes all pleading by the plaintiff as true, factually accepted by the court and is a conclusion of law.

It is then the defenses burden to prove and to present evidence to contradict the conclusion of law or findings of fact that the court has already accepted.

At not time in the hearing did Rontan present a single shred of evidence to refute any of the findings under the default judgement which would include the claim by GDSI that Rontan owed and still owes $900m reals $246m USD in back taxes, nor does it point to any such proof in this filing.

The tax burden is the basis of the litigation in the first place and is well pleaded throughout GDSIs filings.

This is a slam dunk easy call. Rontan is once again trying to project their misdeeds on to GDSI.

I like the way the first case sited is not a case involving a default judgement with already established findings of fact by the court. They try to convolute the two. Nice try but it took all of 15 seconds to break that down.

GLTA $GDSI