InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 97
Posts 3675
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/13/2018

Re: sts66 post# 316653

Wednesday, 12/23/2020 5:16:11 PM

Wednesday, December 23, 2020 5:16:11 PM

Post# of 429277
You are wrong, Sir. The document was filed publicly filed. The attorneys had a duty to review the document, and then go ballistic bringing the issue to the attention of the court. They had ample opportunity to rebut and destroy them.

The cropped table was integral to her decision. So much so that she included it in her actual Opinion. See EPADI II Amicus Brief. See anything written by Hindu Kush on the subject.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News