InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,536.75
(
0.50%
)
US TECH 100
19,694.80
(
0.27%
)
Dow Jones
39,317.42
(
0.02%
)
Brent Oil
87.31
(
-0.02%
)
Bitcoin
55,604.22
(
-2.42%
)
Post# of 47146
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Qarel

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 1
Posts 321
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/30/2002

Qarel

Re: Conrad post# 10128

Sunday, 10/19/2003 9:12:37 AM

Sunday, October 19, 2003 9:12:37 AM

Post# of 47146
Hi Conrad and Tom, I ran both your ROCARs against the first Lichello year (10 - ... - 10 - ... - 10) and found a TOM ROCAR of 138% and a CONRAD ROCAR of 144%. So I was tempted to run al 7.5 years and found a five digit TOM ROCAR and a negative CONRAD ROCAR. Conrad's ROCAR turned negative because the sales outweighed the buys, $$$ wise, and the EI (Effective Investment) divisor became negative.

You guys take it from here! (or from somewhere else entirely)

Regards,

Karel
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up