InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1174
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/01/2016

Re: thermo post# 340946

Sunday, 12/20/2020 11:12:48 AM

Sunday, December 20, 2020 11:12:48 AM

Post# of 701765
Ok, but somewhere along the way they changed their plans. They have the past experience of the blinded publication, right? So, when in August, they said September, they were not thinking of any scientific publication, because based on common sense and on their own past experience, they knew it would be impossible to have it ready by September. So, why did they even say September? Did they review results and realize they were not even close to what they were expecting and decided to go for a scientific publication? Because on the other hand we all already knew that results could be somewhat controversial, at least in some of the endpoints. They just said September because they were overly confident? There is something that does not fit a rational thinking...and all we have is a series of PRs by the company that have come and gone like dust in the wind. Let´s not forget that in February 2017 they explicitly told us that "The external parties managing the Trial are now moving forward with the process to reach data lock." I wonder might they just be doing it all over again?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News