CRTG... No, No, No, the Co', CRTG, must then take their ideas to the patent office and get a certificate that validates the "Patent!" It is then forwarded to the P-Patent Office for approval, as CRTG has to prove that what they "Created" is new and more advanced than the original CHS!
Way off the beam? Why did CRTG sign an agreement with NDSU if there wasn't a patent on the stuff? CRTG did not have any authority, as far as I know, to even think of manufacturing the stuff, as an agreement has to be reached there too! You just cannot manufacture something that isn't yours to manufacture, or CRTG would have said something to that effect at the time they signed the original agreement? All that was agreed to from what we've seen is to commercialize the product under the standards set forth by the agreement? CRTG was to pay for all the testing, and other expenses in getting the CHS to the market! After the agreement expired, all the privileges were obliviated, and NDSU took back the product and all the inherent tasks in that contract! CRTG cannot even manufacture the stuff, without the approval of the Patent holders!
Yes, if CRTG has a valid new product, and has the documents to prove it, they can do whatever they think is necessary to bring the product to market, which in my mind is to have the new CHS+ stuff included in the Electric Vehicle Batteries? They had a chance to bring the old product to market with a few of the Battery contacts they found, but some thing, or things, stopped them cold, thereby having the original agreement cancelled due either to time limitations or the failure to meet certain progress requirements! They had to make commercial strides and they couldn't! They had a standard Partnership agreement, which means they were never to own the Patent, but only to become a financial partner to commercialize it, nothing more! Krafty took on something way over his head IMO? GL to those who hold, for they will need it!!
But then again, my suspicions got the best of me and I sold out, but thinking that I might re-invest if they showed Solid and verifiable proof that there was a CHS+ patent, and not just an idea they wrote on scratch paper? Too many Penny Ceo's get involved thinking they can handle the huge tasks ahead, which the Previous officials won't mention the sometimes insurmountable problems! Many still go ahead and play the Investors for fools thinking they will provide more money, which after a while is futile because of their actions as heads of those Co's!
Do what you want but don't be enamored with Ceo's and what they say, as they are only Salesmen/Saleswomen who may know how to sell, but don't know how to Govern! I've seen enough for my own good, and that I stand by, not what others may think! IMO....
