InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 1512
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/10/2018

Re: jrs5 post# 206425

Thursday, 12/10/2020 8:47:21 AM

Thursday, December 10, 2020 8:47:21 AM

Post# of 232820
true it is a long way off and many here would have left with huge profits but after all that happens what better way for lugee to pledge/return back lqmt shares to eontec than by merging lqmt with an eon bmg spinoff and that new company would not need to share territory/revenue making it far more valuable/lucrative/dominant for lqmt/eon shareholders giving them the best return on their existing shares.

its more profitable to swap lqmt (and the lqmt holdings lugee pledged back to eon shareholders) for shares in the new company/ipo than have lqmt (and again the lqmt holdings lugee pledged back to eon shareholders) compete with the new eon bmg spinoff when it comes too attracting new investors/markets/customers and then having to split territories/revenue and also competing with china manufacturing/machinery.

i dont see it as a negative many china ipo listed on american boards make a huge share value gain.
a fresh rebranding/launch of liquidmetal (assumed name of the newly formed company) into a market where bmg manufacturing has proven to be profitable/successful will attract the big institutions.

again all hypothetical


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News