InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 49
Posts 4987
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/05/2016

Re: None

Tuesday, 12/08/2020 2:38:04 PM

Tuesday, December 08, 2020 2:38:04 PM

Post# of 700914
The issue I have with this whole 'trap the shorts' theory is how incredibly selfish it would make the management team. They're going to intentionally suppress information and keep shorts in the game so they can trap them at the opportune time? You're sacrificing hundreds/thousands of shareholders who would otherwise be holding into dumping their shares because they can't trust management, just so you can bust a few massive short holders with great TLD? Give me a break, I don't buy it.

Why not update on Sawston? You paid big shareholder dollars to expedite it's completion which was supposed to be done in OCTOBER. No update to the people who paid for that? The only explanation I can think of is they botched that effort.

Why not file the 10-Q? This is a planned delay, it's not a complexity of filing delay. They're well beyond the extension deadline at this point. They don't want to release whatever information is in there.

Why not update the clinical trials US site if SAP approval was a priority before unblinding. If they got SAP buyin, that website should be updated. It's on the company to do it, so they are actively choosing not to. What reason could they possibly have to not update that website? If your only response is "to trap shorts" then something is wrong.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News