Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd (NAK)

[LongMetal]

1. Question: I see a bunch of proposed litigations against NAK.

What would happen if a bunch of us (NAK shareholders) sued Col. Delarosa for monetary losses caused by his "Negligent Dereliction of Duty" in ignoring the FEIS facts, which are to be his sole basis in fact for issuance of his ROD?

If ten of us put up a thousand or two, maybe we could get something going?

Is this a possibility? At the very least, it would give visibility to the FACT that the ROD contradicts the FEIS.

Col. Delarosa is new to the Alaska Department, replaced Col. David Hibner on Aug. 14, 2020.

Hibner may have been (probably was) replaced due to political pressure from Murkowski and Sullivan because he was prepared to issue a positive ROD to NAK.

2. I understand that the switch from an Iliamna Barge Crossing to the Northern Land Road Route came out as a preferred choice during discussions with the USACE. If they encouraged it, and then said, "woops...this is horrible...your CMP must include donation of the rest of the planet in perpetuity...!!!" that's a problem! Makes zero sense. This ROD process is supposed to support responsible provision of the USA's needs (minerals and jobs) not place roadblocks; and be based on science, not subjective political opinions (Murkowski, Sullivan, North, Obama, NRDC, Delarosa). So, maybe a return to the Iliamna Barge Route was a better choice?

This really SMELLS a lot like the Obama/Phillip North/Bob Gillam CRAP!