GGB, I don't know what price point you own your shares at. Mine is $0.55 after having started my position at $0.31 and averaged up. At $1.13 I do not feel LP has made me any poorer when looking at my portfolios value.
Do I want it to be a lot higher, as most people feel it should be? YES, We all feel that this stock could take off on positive TLD.
Do I feel that this should have already happened? YES, based on the timelines that company put forth back in August. I do feel that the collection of Data for DL was a lot harder than the company thought it would be, hence the announcement of DL on Oct. 5 and not a month earlier as they predicted.
Based on the Oct 5 DL, should we have had a PR with TLD? YES, but again, I think the process of putting together and analyzing the data from a very long trial took longer than they expected. I also have no insight into what factors the company could be contemplating, if any, and have to get solved before PR'ing TLD.
I agree that it would have been prudent to communicate with shareholders about delays in both TLD and in completion of Sawston Phase I, and that they could have done so without revealing any information about the trial. We know Sawston facility is moving along as posters have found new employees who started working there as well as advertisements looking for employees.
I understand the frustration of people on this board, but keep in mind that no one have been able to dig up anything negative about the science, the trial and any other issue regarding company, other than their timeline and our timeline seems not to match up. Don't let the frustration that things are taking longer get to you. Any delays prior to the last 3 months are in my mind not relevant as this is the first time that company have announced DL, which is a big event and should change everything that happens after that.
