InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 195
Posts 24726
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2010

Re: None

Thursday, 10/29/2020 7:29:24 PM

Thursday, October 29, 2020 7:29:24 PM

Post# of 703668
If Adam were right, which we know he wasn’t because of the 2017 Federal court ruling, parsing through all of the details, and the company had unblinded and determined futility or worse, then why would the trial have kept starting new patients who were “enrolled” while coming up short on placebo, and if it were harmful, why would the public not have been informed as to the reason, so that patients would have informed consent to continue.

The short theories fall apart the deeper you probe and the more information and sophisticated knowledge you have to look at the totality circumstances and of the overall picture.

Poor Adam. Looks like he is going to lose his mind before this is all over. His disrespect for the scientific process to engage in what appear to me to be pure manipulations of a rhetorical nature, reveal a man who is more of an interloper in the markets than an accurate and truthful reporter of scientific and economic reality. He roots for disastrous results and then effectively serves as the knife’s edge of the short arm. And when reality contradicts his views, he tries to prove he is right with columns that focus his following on making him seem correct, regardless of the facts. I know I’ve seen this kind of behavior somewhere else...

All my personal opinion.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News