Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[alm2]

8 maybe correct as to CAFC procedure as to response to the court - but forgive me these are allegations/assertions that Hikma/ it’s lawyers it’s expert perpetrated a fraud on the court / misled the court / deliberately altered the face of a document (cropped table )
Hikma / their lawyers/ their expert may wish in the public domain to respond to such ..whether formally as requested by the court or not
You are a lawyer ... if such allegations were made against you how would you respond ? You might wait until invited by the court to do so .. if not so invited would you just ignore ??
And as to professional investigation/ disciplinary action - seriously are they not valid considerations here ... ??the amicus says fraud - in effect by Hikma it’s lawyers it’s expert
If there is traction in this amicus there would have to be such
If deliberate conspiracy by Hikma it’s lawyers it’s expert to pervert a courts decision - one with billions of dollar consequence as to loss -you bet it would be a criminal investigation
Alm