Monday, September 07, 2020 11:37:02 AM
created in its absence is legislation that Congress would not
have enacted.”
The fundamental problem with HERA is, unconstitutional interpretation of HERA by corrupt bureaucrats and validated by equally corrupt judges. HERA is replete with such unconstitutional interpretations.
Under US Constitution (SCOTUS ruling), any Gov apparatus that exercises executive power can exist only under the direct supervision of POTUS with POTUS having constitutional authority to remove at will.
HERA is a law that created new Gov agency FHFA, not only as a independent executive agency but also an executive Gov agency that is independent of Congress and Judiciary.
This makes HERA fundamentally flawed law under US constitution. Judge Lamberth hinted at this in his first ruling.
If SCOTUS tries to remedy the constitutional flaws in HERA then HERA no longer meets the unconstitutional intentions of Congress. So it will be in the best interest of all if SCOTUS abolishes HERA and restores the previous HUD/OFHEO.
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM
ILUS Provides a First Quarter Filing Update • ILUS • May 16, 2024 11:26 AM