InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 294
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/27/2017

Re: None

Monday, 09/07/2020 6:24:37 AM

Monday, September 07, 2020 6:24:37 AM

Post# of 708090
Cures Act implications for DCVAX direct if DCVAX-L is approved...

The provision under Subtitle C ->

Enables drug manufacturers to submit real-world evidence (RWE) instead of randomized control trial (RCT) data to seek new indications for existing medications. RWE is clinical practice and utilization data collected outside of the RCT setting and is regarded for its comprehensive patient
perspective under circumstances that reflect real-life experiences. Under the Cures Act, permissible sources of RWE
include ongoing surveillance data, observational studies, registries, claims, and patient-centered outcomes research activities. he costs to generate RWE for the approval of new indications will be substantially lower than the costs for traditional RCT evidence generation. Thus, manufacturers are positioned to achieve higher returns on investments when their overhead is reduced by observational studies.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29952706/

So according to the law, if DCVAX-L is approved and is efficacious, new indications like DCvax direct will have streamlined approval without the need for clinical trials.

Am I interpreting this wrong? I urge everyone to read the cures act part about this particular area in approvals for new indications of existing medications so we can have a better understanding of implications for direct if L is approved. I'll see what else I can find.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News