Wow, that's some analysis RH! If you want to stick to the facts, which those of us who avoided Solly's past shenanigans choose to do, who cares where Solly is? He's been contractually castrated, in a NY court, under NY law (SIAF is a US registered company, so he's caught in the web), only subject to court approval. He's old, and old news. If the new sheriffs fail us, they've failed themselves. If they don't follow through, they lose millions. I doubt that is their plan. Professional investors plan to make millions. If SIAF stock doesn't appreciate, they lose. After all of the money, time, and energy put into the litigation (won, as soon as Solly capitulated, and signed the settlement), and their investments, do you think professional investors drop the ball at the goal line? Again, beating a dead horse, the value near term, is in the Tri-way dividend. This will be a priority on their to-do list post approval as it is the quickest way to unlock value. If the value was not there when they visited during settlement discussions, they'd be long gone by now. If they can fix the company along the way, that would be more upside for us all in the longer term. I believe they will follow through. If they weren't going to do so, why would they be willing to take the beating the Judge will hand them at the hearing regarding their misleading filings regarding "non-payment" in the settlement, and potentially trading on non-public material information? they wouldn't. I have placed my bet accordingly. If you don't believe in the new order, well, you are free to be flat or go short. Good luck, the results will be known soon enough. Worst case, I break even. Best case, I'm buying Dutch Heinekens, even though he rudely has not yet accepted my offer.
