If DD is sloppy then the conclusions, reached from it will be false, for example much of your reply refers to debts that we have no reason to believe will ever be converted into shares :
So why should we expect these two five year old debts, to be converted into shares? The 10 Q surely didn't say they would, one of the notes will not even mature until June of next year. I see no reason to claim either note will be converted.
So again this note can not convert until the pps is at least 300% of the conversion price of $0.015, and it doesn't mature until next year. It is also convertible up to a certain sum, not a certain number of shares, all next year above 4.5 cents, so why should we fear dilution from it now? No reason at all, and if it ever converts that means that someone hitting the ask right now got a 800% return in 6 months, investors usually like that sort of thing.
Ok so that's 4,069,118 of future convertible notes to worry about once the price rebounds. I don't think us investors are scared of either the price rebounding to a penny and a half or 4 million shares of dilution at that price.
This note again can not be converted unless the pps is at least $0.015, and it doesn't mature until August 2024, so why should we be afraid of it now? I don't see a good reason.
It's worth noting that the company was willing to pay $129,338 in prepayment penalties to avoid any of the variable rate notes from converting, so why should we believe that has now changed? I see no reason to believe it has. The rest of your post is about past conversions and bank loans which are both irrelevant to future conversions. Really having debunked the 1.5 billion shares claim point by point, I don't see any logical reason for anyone to believe it.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.