InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 50
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/15/2007

Re: Abundance88 post# 29721

Tuesday, 09/01/2020 3:27:51 PM

Tuesday, September 01, 2020 3:27:51 PM

Post# of 34713
My understanding is that vape molecules are too large to be absorbed properly by the lungs, whereas smoke molecules are smaller allowing for better absorption of nicotine by the lungs. Vape is typically better absorbed through the nose, throat and mouth because of the size of particle, through the mucous membrane. It takes longer for vape to get the nicotine into the users system vs smoke.

We know that Lexaria's tech reduces particle size, so with different makeup of vape cartridges they may be looking at a much safer, more efficient vape? Faster absorption, much like smoke? Or gum which would also be absorbed the same way.

I don't know, just spit-balling here, but Bunka mentioning "not burning" twice is the reason I started thinking of something different.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LEXX News