InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 3402
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2016

Re: jrs5 post# 198996

Monday, 08/24/2020 9:32:39 AM

Monday, August 24, 2020 9:32:39 AM

Post# of 232839
Just an FYI, and I understand your reasoning, but Arthrex wanted an NDA from Kang, except the Liquidmetal litigation blew that up and the private emails became public - there are life lessons to be learned there, too:

a) be careful what you say in emails, even though the point is to document, and;

b) vet your associates and never deal with a scumbag who has a checkered past that’s public.

I despise that Kang put an innocent engineer in the middle of all that shit. That engineer was just trying to get product done and move things forward. One of the last things on his mind was investigating the shady history of a vendor, who probably provided every appearance of legitimacy.

We likely won’t know who it is either until the Apple event (and even then) or the Q3 financials, which aren’t required to disclose the customer name and would cause huge headaches if it was disclosed with an NDA in place. Besides, if they prove they made money, does an investor care who the customer is? Although there’s no doubt that a serious name customer would bring a lot of attention for both investors and potential customers on the fence.

Again, I much prefer your rationale and hope it’s 100% accurate for everyone.

Either way, it’s going to be an interesting next few months - if they disappoint, who’s going to join me to voice their displeasure at 20321 Valencia Circle? Just kidding - sort of...
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News