Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[MontanaState83]

I don’t find this very encouraging:


“Finally, BMS argues that the district court improperly compared the weight of the different secondary considerations against each other when it summarized that the factors were “mixed.” J.A. 152. We understand the district court to be noting that some categories of evidence simply were not as helpful to BMS's case as others. We do not read the opinion as suggesting that unhelpful evidence somehow diminished the strength of the more persuasive forms of evidence.”

What’s to stop them from concluding the same in our case?