InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 3820
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/23/2014

Re: Hmsoqu post# 113267

Thursday, 08/13/2020 7:10:43 AM

Thursday, August 13, 2020 7:10:43 AM

Post# of 140478
You aren't missing something - ONE SINGLE ENTITY agreed to the $18M offering - confirmed by recent financials and shares outstanding - HOWEVER, that entity has chosen to strategically stay right below the 20% threshold that requires shareholder approval. With that knowledge, it is evident it can only be a large strategic Medtech company. Of course, McNally sits on this information and has not divulged it to the public. While McNally and Genova have enhanced the SINGLE PORT platform and deserve some credit which they have already gotten from shareholders in previous votes, they next vote on McNally is a vote based on his words and actions. He has NOT supported PPS, which he has stated he would. He has NOT been more transparent with shareholders, which he has stated he would. He has NOT provided updates on milestones, which he stated he would. When the vote comes for BOD, it is as much about what they have said and followed thru when they have discussed Titan publically. They already got the votes last year for the development of SINGLE PORT, THIS YEAR the vote is based on their follow up and follow thru which for me, I have not seen.

Like everyone else, I was very happy to see the agreement with Medtronic but again, where is the follow up by McNally and his support of shareholders, where is his promise to support PPS and provide transparency. The vote for the BOD this year, should be a vote based on who will provide the transparency, follow up and follow thru that is the basic principal of providing value to shareholders.