InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 113
Posts 16413
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/22/2011

Re: PayMEmf post# 196948

Wednesday, 08/12/2020 12:40:45 PM

Wednesday, August 12, 2020 12:40:45 PM

Post# of 232986

Judging from the 60% yield data released by Changzhou Shijing, the current technology of manufacturers in material research and development, equipment development and process optimization is still somewhat insufficient. Some people in the industry have also pointed out that the liquid metal preparation process and equipment quantification methods are not perfect, and the lack of supporting resources will greatly restrict the industrialization and large-scale application of liquid metal.



According to your latest information you posted this morning, sir,

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=157559778

does it really matter how many machines producing at a 40 per cent return rate a company has.

Each and every machine needs to be MODIFIED before any volume production rate can be achieved.

Hate to mention history, but LQMT had a production facility in Pyong Taek Korea of 24 machines, each of which was continually modified and upgraded to improve production. Originally, 48 machines were ordered, but once the folly of the Growell Machines unreliability was realized and their high rejection rate was unsustainable, the balance of the outstanding 24 machines was cancelled.

It seems a similar process of continual upgrade is happening with Professor Li's machines, and, in fact, based upon your report today, all of the new 50 machines ordered most likely are also not up to snuff and probably require additional retrofitting. If not, then what is the discussion in your article about 60 per cent yield all about?

War does not determine who is right - only who is left.

And how many of those who were right about LQMT the last 20 years are still left?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News