Wednesday, August 05, 2020 10:16:30 PM
https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljdec/2019/id1389cff.pdf
Key points: (which counter Division’s Petition points, directly from Judge’s Initial Decision)
1. Pg 2. “The Initial Decision is based on the existing record and the Commission’s public official records concerning Digital Brand, of which official notice has been taken pursuant to 17 CFR, Section 201.323. All arguments and proposed findings and conclusions that are inconsistent with this decision WERE CONSIDERED AND REJECTED.”
2.Pg 7 Para 3. The Judge addressed why Absolute is neither appropriate precedent, nor on point. ”Thus the company’s situation DIFFERS from cases in which the Commission determined that revocation was necessary or appropriate.”
Go DBMM!!!!
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/16/2024 09:32:32 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/29/2023 09:31:08 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/17/2023 09:15:45 PM
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM