InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,360.81
(
0.18%
)
Post# of 145144
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

toncatmad

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 31
Posts 8673
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2014

toncatmad

Re: Lucky77Dice post# 106721

Monday, 08/03/2020 3:25:52 PM

Monday, August 03, 2020 3:25:52 PM

Post# of 145144
That was only for the SISP. In the beginning when they were looking to restructure or someone to buy the business as a whole that was part of it. It said that if the winning bidder needed the existing shares could be canceled by amending the articles of incorporation. Since the SISP failed and it turned into a liquidation that wasn’t needed as not one single bidder wanted the company as a whole or the shares.
Mica stayed that in his response to G5 and it was also in the monitors reports. None of the bidders wanted the shares as evident by the bids
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up