InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 144
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

Re: HinduKush post# 289077

Saturday, 08/01/2020 12:54:53 PM

Saturday, August 01, 2020 12:54:53 PM

Post# of 426564
H-

Du removed the ApoB argument summarily in her judgement, using the Kurabayashi data which she misinterpreted and was in clear egregious error statistically and scientifically by any standard. It was a clear and erroneous error if not legally then scientifically. However, practically speaking the best approach now may be to show the CAFC that egregious and unwarranted legal process error occurred in determining obviousness definitely occurred (vis a vis weighing objective indicia etc..)

Agree. Du made (at least) two, clearly enormous legal errors:

1.) Instead of deference to the USPTO factual determination regarding unexpected benefit she "vacated" it based on wrong "assumption" (Kurabayashi was not considered by the USPTO)

2.) Used the non-existing SCs (as "proof" of obviousness) instead of "ignore" (do not consider in any way).

Best,
G

Disclosure: I wrote this post myself, and it expresses my own opinions (IMHO). I am not receiving compensation for it.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News