OK trunk, since you have asked for comments several times...
The SP is falling, "again" because the euphoria of the 100 foot, tethered test, that proved "nothing" we didn't already know, is wearing off.
Sans2A is a "demonstrator". If it does what WilliamFL said Mr. Bleckman said, and I quote-
"4. Is the Sanswire 2A designed to go the Full 65,000 ft?
Answer: Yes. Sanswire 2A is designed to go to 65,000 ft. It will have to do everything that is going to be required on Sanswire 3 just on a smaller scale. The hardest part will be getting the vehicle through the 40,000 ft range."
Then it will be a significant "long term" event for the company and I will be the first to admit it. That means 65,000' for "months" at station. If however it can only achieve a fraction of the altitude promised for relatively short periods of time, days, weeks... then we've been had again.
If the Sans2A is a failure, and can't do what Mr. Bleckman said it can do, then of course it still has one other very useful purpose...
It can be used to excite investors again with a plethora of hyped press releases at lower altitudes and shorter durations, which will "not demonstrate much less prove" they can do it at the altitude or duration they have been telling us.
In other words... BUSINESS AS USUAL!
PS Just curious, how many on this board believe what Mr. Bleckman said? Is Sans2A going to 65,000 feet for months, or is this yet another example of the company misleading investors?
