InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,482.87
(
0.09%
)
US TECH 100
19,304.80
(
0.47%
)
Dow Jones
39,164.06
(
0.09%
)
Brent Oil
85.49
(
0.08%
)
Bitcoin
61,977.27
(
0.59%
)
Post# of 96905
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

BrokeAgent

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 3726
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/03/2017

BrokeAgent

Re: long uoip post# 81372

Monday, 07/13/2020 10:39:59 PM

Monday, July 13, 2020 10:39:59 PM

Post# of 96905
Ah, okay, makes sense now. It sounds like the judge initially denied the motion because Wechselberger is Cisco's expert, not Cox's expert. But if Cox's expert relied on Wechselberger's testimony, and Cisco has agreed to indemnify Cox, then it sounds like Chanbond should be allowed to cross examine him at Cox's trial.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up