I'm curious. Mainly, because I don't recall his name from Cisco's CAFC appeal. The win on portions of the '822 patent were strictly due to the absence of "RF" before "channel bonding" in some of the specs. I'm thinking that was Wechselberger's only contribution to this litigation.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.