InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1185
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/20/2017

Re: flipper44 post# 293909

Tuesday, 07/07/2020 1:02:44 PM

Tuesday, July 07, 2020 1:02:44 PM

Post# of 699498

If we are still on schedule today, as a few posters report via phone calls with DI, then it is logical to infer initial(soft) data lock occurred already.



Wait, what? Logical? Is it logical to draw conclusions devoid of all empirical evidence and any consideration of past track record for truth and accuracy? Wow. Of all the sources to be telling us what's logical. How's that submission to NICE coming along? It would be logical to assume that with the proof you had that it was done a couple of years ago, and that we are racing along toward approval, no? Would love an update.

You know, it just doesn't matter whether they have "soft locked" or not. It's all completely meaningless anyway. The "soft" lock is just another distraction, and anyone with half a brain could see it. The only thing that matters anymore with this company and this trial is TLD, and a soft lock literally does nothing to advance the possibility of us ever actually seeing it. They'll hold off the frothing dogs as long as they can, then throw this bone and crawl back into their cave - for months and months and months. You will see.

NWBO is a scam, plain and simple. They shamelessly used this entire ruse to artificially hike the share price and pay off warrant holders. I wouldn't be surprised if it was all about Bigger and giving him an exit that made it all worth his while. They owed him big time, and these last couple of sp hikes easily could have been his way out. He and they always knew that data lock, soft or hard, was in the back pocket and could be pulled out any time they needed it or when Bigger decided he'd had enough. They really could not care less about you, me or the rest of the common shareholders. Could. Not. Care. Less.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News