I don't believe everything I read from RT but it does have information you won't see in other news outlets and I use it as a counter-balance to western news outlets that tend to tilt heavily towards globalist viewpoints.
Just taking the article that was linked earlier I don't really see anything I disagree with. Hydroxycloroquine has been demonized by our media and stated many times that it is very dangerous, while the big pharma companies that run advertising on those networks have interests in discrediting a cheap solution like hydroxycloroquine and promoting their much more expensive solutions like remdesivir or the vaccines they are waiting on. The Lancet and NEJM had to pull articles stating the dangerous effects of hydroxycloroquine because the papers were supposedly based on totally fake data made up by a team from Surgisphere that consisted of a science fiction writer and a adult entertainment model. Our western media used these studies non-stop to provide more evidence that their viewers should definitely not use hydroxycloroquine and tied it in to their constant anti-Trump coverage.
I read an article a few days ago that the Henry Ford Health System in Michigan unleashed a study that they were seeing around 50% less daaths of COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxycloroquine than those who were not.
So, at the end of the day, I wouldn't totally trust RT but I take their articles individually by their own merit and compare it against a lot of the propaganda we get fed in our own western media. I don't see a problem with the hydroxycloroquine article that was linked earlier with the revelation of recent data that seems to coroborate it. After all, big pharma would not profit nearly to the extent if a cheap and fairly safe treatment is able to be an effective cure and also it would give positive press to President Trump.
