InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 48
Posts 5518
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/04/2009

Re: None

Thursday, 07/02/2020 8:59:50 AM

Thursday, July 02, 2020 8:59:50 AM

Post# of 426447
I think the reason that Du put in weighting of SCs is because there are case law out there such that unmet need and commercial success had overcome obviousness, i.e., it's not an unforced error from Du. Does anybody recall any such case law (Samsung Vs Apple?)? If there were case law, then our case is quite strong (90%?) since we know weighting of SC is clearly erroneous. The only way for H&R to win is although weighting of SC is erroneous but either unmet need or commercial success get downgraded by the panel.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News