Global Digital Solutions Inc (GDSI)

[Coreton]

As clearly stated in GDSIs response
Rontan failed to site any “ relevant case law”.

The Judge chose to allow a “reply” because GDSI addresses “Reconsideration”. Smart move. GDSI council. Notably ( Isaacson) still on the case. Addressed any future attempt by Rontan et al to file a new motion for Reconsideration. Rontans council will now have to address that here and now. Not 6 weeks from now with a new motion.

This is why Isaacson is there.

I have no problem with allowing a “reply” in this circumstance.

As I predicted. GDSI is in possession of numerous emails, phone conversations and text messages that demonstrate that the sworn affidavits are lies and that false statements were made to the court in the Motion to set aside.

Rontan was fully aware of the Judgement and the risk of judgement well before the dates they claim in their motions and in their sworn affidavits.

Can’t wait to read the judges Denial of Rantans motions. Should be quite the read.