InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 237
Posts 10817
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/17/2006

Re: None

Sunday, 06/28/2020 10:36:23 PM

Sunday, June 28, 2020 10:36:23 PM

Post# of 426264
G.
I see your point here...

As Toddrobertking explained in post# 283161...

A settlement without a reversal of Du's opinion of obviousness..Would not require the DC to vacate Du's opinion..The DC would not be compelled to change her opinion on the obviousness of the patents..And therefore Amarin would not have patent protection from others who wish to sell Vascepa for the MARINE label...

So Regardless of my thinking a settlement would be a good thing..Legally Amarin needs to win the appeal which will restore its patents.. And if Amarin wins the appeal...Then it is not clear that Amarin should settle.

Thanks for the explanation

":>) JL
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News