InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 1636
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/09/2011

Re: HDGabor post# 283472

Sunday, 06/28/2020 6:58:27 PM

Sunday, June 28, 2020 6:58:27 PM

Post# of 424163
Thank you G for your insight:

Outcome ...

Settlement: 0.00% (-100%)

Any settlement makes sense (if any) with vacatur only. But vacatur based on what? Singer's briefs? If it is good for vacatur it should be good for win ... But let's accept the vacatur (with settlement). It will trigger a GIA (maybe everywhere) because nobody will pay a reasonable amount for the US with existing possibility that somebody will win a new case (about MARINE) and the "pending" R-IT case ...

The settlement is not about money but about timing (market entry). Meanwhile I do not have the details of the TEVA and Apotex settlements, I am 99.9% sure Amarin could not settle an earlier entry for Hikma (or Reddy) than for T & A. (I mean If Hikma want anything before August 2029, T&A will get it also.)

Furthermore: any (most of the) business decision should be the best interest and is not the most safety. As I know not all of the court cases ended by settlement. Make it short: we bought Amarin shares and not government bonds ...

Remand: 0.01%

I see too many errors in the DC Order ... furthermore a remand will trigger - with 100% possibility, independently from the new DC Order - a new appeal.



I agree completely G! Spot on IMO!

We differ a little on the Affirmation or Reversal and I tend to be more pessimistic just in the nature of Appeals. I'll try and get my thoughts out next Saturday as I should be off for Independence Day. Take care and always appreciate your insight.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News