InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 588
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/18/2020

Re: sentiment_stocks post# 291855

Friday, 06/26/2020 1:49:58 AM

Friday, June 26, 2020 1:49:58 AM

Post# of 701171
I guess as a lay person, the way I understood it is this:

1/3 of the group was to receive a placebo- but many ‘crossed over’ at varying points and actually received DCVAX. This makes sense, of course, from a humane standpoint.

However, when the scientists and statisticians go to compare the control against the treated group, is there any way to have a control arm at all? It seems like this would become a very difficult calculation- proving that DCVAX did indeed extend the lives of patients- whether it was given right away, one month in, three months or longer- with such a small number (my understanding is that 331 is a relatively small sample for a stage 3 trial) it would not be easy to pinpoint the efficacy of the treatment.

I completely understand then, the need for the length of this trial and the OS to be calculated to the very last patient- it seems like this would be a pathway to approval.
Would they, in that case, simply compare length of survival for the patients to a ‘typical’ group of GBM patients, not necessarily from the trial? Of that could be done, it seems like the DCVAX patients have MUCH longer life expectancies- which is a fantastic thing.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News