InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 234
Posts 26887
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/12/2013

Re: Biobillionair post# 282499

Tuesday, 06/23/2020 6:29:05 PM

Tuesday, June 23, 2020 6:29:05 PM

Post# of 424593
The quote goes on to say,



This argument also presents a clear path to reversal that does not require the Court to delve into the scientifically thorny question of “two patient populations” versus the number 500. The pathway is this: by weighing the secondary considerations against one another, Judge Du erroneously discounted the evidence of secondary considerations found in favor of non-obviousness (namely, commercial success and long-felt need.) If those secondary considerations had not been discounted, then they would have weighed more heavily in favor of non-obviousness. And that alone may justify the finding that the generics failed to satisfy their clear-and-convincing evidence burden. It will be very interesting to see if the Judges pursue this line of questioning during the oral argument.



BB

If you're not good at being yourself, then maybe that's being yourself!

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News