Monday, December 18, 2006 5:40:30 PM
It may just be my perception, but there's credibility lent
to the hypothesis that there's a lot of shorts in this
and more than a few naked shorts as well.
Another hypothesis I'm entertaining is that there are shorts
out there that can't afford to cover unless we see the price
drop even more. This might explain the negative verbosity.
If they shorted shares at higher prices thinking it would
be easy to cover later on but come up short on the $ to
accomplish this, then they would certainly have a lot to lose.
If they gambled and didn't keep enough cash back to cover
at current prices, they stand to lose an awful lot.
If some longs are actually continuing to accumulate
like myself, then they curtail the short from covering
a large position as shares are snapped up when sold by longs.
For the minor long fun stock speculator, 250k shares is still
a nice acquisition and limit without getting too deep, imo.
I think we'll all be more informed by May of 2007.
At least I hope we are.
My opinion is just that, my opinion.
So make no investment decisions based on my opinion.
#board-9931
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM