InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 635
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/08/2018

Re: Bouf post# 281843

Sunday, 06/21/2020 10:01:05 AM

Sunday, June 21, 2020 10:01:05 AM

Post# of 426721
Bouf in a criminal case such an experts evidence would most definitely be admitted ....
The issue will be - is it factually incorrect or is it factually correct-?? not any issue of interpretation- we are getting lost here in the suggestion of statistical interpretation
It has nothing to do with such -you can not interpret an incorrect fact as correct -all the interpretation in the world will never make a fact true if it is false -you most certainly can make a mistake to think a fact is correct when it clearly is not - as per Du—

the world is round - many for many centuries considered it was flat - their interpretation of what they observed did not render their mistake correct - they were simply wrong
(We can actually consider that the world is not actually a pure sphere- but round does for the purposes of illustration !


If there are errors of fact - (That is something Du arrived at in her decision making process which is totally factually incorrect ) ( it would be helpful if the whole wide world accepts that Du made errors of fact )-then the point in issue will be won
Singer will assert there was serious error of fact
Alm
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News