InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 144
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

Re: rafunrafun post# 281756

Saturday, 06/20/2020 8:22:59 PM

Saturday, June 20, 2020 8:22:59 PM

Post# of 426569
r-

did Covington say it is 6 & Generics say it is 8? We know that Du concluded that it is 8.

I say it is Sunday (CET) you say Saturday (EST) ... somebody conclude: it is Saturday everywhere ...

Because if those 2 did say that, shouldn't Covington have explained why it is 6 and not 8?

My take / view: Generics did not say (explicitly) it is 8 ... it was Judge Du interpretation only.

In light of the statistically-significant differential effects reported between the EPA and control groups, a POSA would have attributed the reduction in Apo B to EPA.

I am not aware of any statement / claim by Generics like this ... they said

Kurabayashi further reports a statistically significant reduction in Apo B levels in the EPA group of 6.9%. (Id. at 4-5.) With a p value of < .001, EPA’s effects on Apo B were highly significant. (Id.; see also ECF No. 367 at 737:1-23.) In contrast, Kurabayashi reports a non statistically significant 1.5% reduction in Apo B levels in the control group

Which is true ... but is not the same as J Du conclusion.

I mean:
Generics said: "In light of the statistically-significant differential effects reported (with)in the EPA and control groups"

J Du see it as: "In light of the statistically-significant differential effects reported between the EPA and control groups"

btw: I raised it previously (still could be a result of my ESL status) ... the Generics were "tricky" ...

Best,
G

Disclosure: I wrote this post myself, and it expresses my own opinions (IMHO). I am not receiving compensation for it.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News