InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 4518
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/28/2006

Re: kingpindg post# 339175

Thursday, 06/18/2020 4:02:49 AM

Thursday, June 18, 2020 4:02:49 AM

Post# of 361154
You have a point by mentioning the "funding by litigation finance firms".

But... those firms usually only take cases that are almost predictable in their positive outcome. This because of the HUGE costs of litigation.

So evidently it was/is worthwhile for all stakeholders involved, if at all they had to make use of a litigation finance firm...

It is not the most likely scenario.


And SSC:

"Total doing a buyout of this grey market company with the SEC seeking to revoke its shares for delinquent filings is not bloody likely. Shareholders are indeed stuck."

Again, again, again: a loop-discussion.

This has been addressed and debunked numerous times.

* Longs bought at these levels, why unload now?
* Litigation trajectory is in final stages, why unload now?
* Total will start in the EEZ and JDZ in the near future, why unload now?
* Why not wait for news, why unload now?

Revocation, if at all, does not matter one IOTA for shareholders' ownership, as was shown via official documents on more than one occasion.

Sigh...

This has been addressed so many times... shorters also have no option than to wait for news, whether they like it or not.

Shall we wait for news? No?

Yes! Everybody is obligated to wait for news.