InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 144
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

Re: eightisenough post# 280536

Tuesday, 06/16/2020 12:24:15 PM

Tuesday, June 16, 2020 12:24:15 PM

Post# of 426271
e-

Point #1 is USPTO fault--for giving her the prima facie of obviousness (they ruled non obviousness only b/c sec. cons. which makes things complicated)

As I recollect: the USPTO determined prima facie of obviousness about TG lowering (ONLY) ... did not include LDL-C or Apo-B effect ... did not consider LDL-C or Apo-B effect as prima facie obvious.

No question: the TG lowering effect itself was / is obvious.

Best,
G

Disclosure: I wrote this post myself, and it expresses my own opinions (IMHO). I am not receiving compensation for it.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News