InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 7622
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/31/2012

Re: stockmojo9 post# 88742

Thursday, 06/11/2020 4:29:52 PM

Thursday, June 11, 2020 4:29:52 PM

Post# of 111183
We're the ECAPS paid back just last year? That justifies the timeframe to research and respond, have court delays etc bringing us to this point.


And, Waske & Wu get to say what they want, too.

You know they are all playing the game as far as they can push it, jersey.

I posted a brief concern the Waske filing never mentioned the deferment period allocated in the CT prospectus.

The problem has been the Judge has been extending it as per the Trustee request in the POR.

And, I have yet to see Waske or anyone post a response to this observation.

If the ECAPS are paid back, then maybe the stronger argument is with them.

A few thoughts.

mojo