InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1681
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2010

Re: JERSEYHAWG post# 88739

Thursday, 06/11/2020 4:22:13 PM

Thursday, June 11, 2020 4:22:13 PM

Post# of 111041
And, Waske & Wu get to say what they want, too.

You know they are all playing the game as far as they can push it, jersey.

I posted a brief concern the Waske filing never mentioned the deferment period allocated in the CT prospectus.

The problem has been the Judge has been extending it as per the Trustee request in the POR.

And, I have yet to see Waske or anyone post a response to this observation.

If the ECAPS are paid back, then maybe the stronger argument is with them.

A few thoughts.

mojo