Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[alm2]

Kiwi /HK -did I refer to RAF/ HK in my earlier post
We must remember that Du is a judge familiar with patent cases and stats and statistical analysis - Amarin are entitled to say that she adopted an incorrect statistical conclusion (which HK suggests and high school student could have recognised
She not only failed to recognise the error but then actually based a crucial element of her judgement by adopting that error
The error can be pointed out in the appeal- the fact that she adopted that error can be pointed out in the appeal
The error was Obvious!!!!

Albeit the error was not pointed out (so it is suggested in the trial) she as a judge should not adopt something which obviously wrong
Alm