Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[jessellivermore]

raf....

Quote: "How do you think Singer will introduce this to the Court?"

As pointed out by several credible sources including the medical sources paper..AMA..This is not new evidence...It is evidence discussed extensively in the DC trial..And is such Singer will have no problem introducing it in the AC trial..

Why is it important?...Two reasons...first MORI lacks credibility because it is not a peer reviewed article. MORI is merely hypothesis generating and makes no clear distinction between the actions of EPA vs DHA.. MORI can not make the argument (clear and overwhelming evidence) because it is not powered (designed) to do so..Second reason..The judge (Du) made a fundamental (mathematical) error in declaring that MORI showed statistically significant evidence. MORI did not show stat sig between the the control and the active arms..

A factual error might not be grounds for reversal in every case..But in this case Du based her entire thesis on this fact..I can not imagine the AC not reversing Du..
This in addition on her procedural error of transferring the burden of proof on the patent validity from the defendants to Amarin...

A real CAMFU

":>) JL