InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 144
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

Re: MontanaState83 post# 278657

Sunday, 06/07/2020 12:24:15 PM

Sunday, June 07, 2020 12:24:15 PM

Post# of 426572
M-

As TTE replied to you it was about TG only.

btw: The TG reduction was obvious ... the USPTO used this(!) for prima facie obviousness ... Meanwhile - If I read correctly - Judge Du referred to USPTO prima facie determination as it was about TG reduction AND LDL-C (non) effect. ...

Best,
G

Disclosure: I wrote this post myself, and it expresses my own opinions (IMHO). I am not receiving compensation for it.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News