InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 237
Posts 10817
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/17/2006

Re: None

Thursday, 06/04/2020 7:37:49 AM

Thursday, June 04, 2020 7:37:49 AM

Post# of 426504
"The weed of crime bears bitter fruit."

I remain unconvinced Judge Du's surprising verdict was simply the product of her not only being well versed in Patent law: or not being very bright..I also am not impressed with the notion this was simply an activist judge expressing her political views...

The verdict here was less of a treatise on Patent Law and more of an outright theft of property..Du's errors were not misplacement of punctuation marks, or misspellings...They consistently favored the defendants and injured the plaintiff. To me that conveys proof that there was an agenda here...And that Du was not in the least bit interested in being impartial (the first and most important requirement of a judge). This and the scope and magnitude of her errors of procedure and fact are so egregious..That to my mind she was motivated (strongly motivated) to award the the rights to Amarin's property to the generics.

Follow the Money...
If I were the company. I would be forced to consider the possibility that this judge was paid off..It would not be the first time a judge was persuaded to loosen up on her ethical requirements. I think the company would to do well to hire investigators..
I'm sure Du understood no matter how much she handed the generics with fake law and factual errors..Once she rendered her verdict. The company would have a difficult time reversing the opinion in The Appeals Court.

IMO her opinion and actions in the Reno trial are simply theft of property...my property and the property of other shareholders. She is no less of a criminal than a man holding a gun in a bank or an ally..Its just instead of a gun she uses her gavel. And she is downright arrogant about the whole thing...

":>) JL
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News