InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 195
Posts 24733
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2010

Re: Poor Man - post# 285463

Thursday, 05/28/2020 12:36:37 AM

Thursday, May 28, 2020 12:36:37 AM

Post# of 704154
The consideration argument you may think sounds sophisticated, but it’s not. Your implication that the chairperson is giving the consideration is flatly incorrect. It would not stand up in any court of law. It’s purely made up.

The warrants were expiring. They gave an extension for a delay in execution, period. Your looking beyond the contract to make it invalid is irrelevant unless you can claim some other law makes it so. You have not referenced another law. You’ve suggested it is about “consideration”. And your argument is nonsense.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News