Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[sts66]

Mostly a great post - but was that 2nd Mori paper cited in AMRN patents, was it considered by the USPTO, and was it brought up at the trial? If no to any of them, then it's meaningless, can't be used - AFAIK, even if the first two are "yes", if the 3rd is "no", then it can't be used by Singer in the appeal, not part of the trial record, can't introduce new evidence at the CAFC.