InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,304.72
(
0.70%
)
US TECH 100
18,318.00
(
0.95%
)
Dow Jones
39,069.59
(
0.01%
)
Brent Oil
82.29
(
0.38%
)
Bitcoin
68,565.10
(
0.08%
)
Post# of 210407
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

SSKILLZ1

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 290
Posts 85138
Boards Moderated 63
Alias Born 02/06/2005

SSKILLZ1

Member Level

Re: excel post# 195438

Tuesday, 05/19/2020 10:35:28 PM

Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:35:28 PM

Post# of 210407
I think it is just ownership that is wrong here, and I don't see how anyone could see it any other way. Players are not asking for anything crazy they are asking for pro rata version of there salary, which is a contract that the owner signed before and agreed originally in march. Now they essentially decided to renegotiate after the deal was done. And to make matter worse the players are the ones that are taking the risks not just with themselves but there families as well in my opinion.

---All above is just my humble opinion.
And I could always be wrong.
And as always do your own DD.---
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=5316

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up